News

An IC-DISC is not free to choose any convenient year-end. Although taxpayers generally compute taxable income based on their taxable year under IRC section 441(a), Congress imposed a special rule for DISCs. Under section 441(h)(1), the taxable year of a DISC is the taxable year of the shareholder, or group of shareholders with the same […]

Tax-exempt organizations often assume that dividend income is excluded from unrelated business taxable income. That is usually true under IRC section 512(b)(1), which excludes dividends, interest, annuities, and similar passive income from UBTI [2]. But IC-DISC investments are an important exception. An IC-DISC is generally not taxed at the corporate level; instead, its shareholders are […]

Foreign contract manufacturing can satisfy the 20-percent conversion-cost test, but that cuts both ways for IC-DISC purposes. If the foreign contractor’s work is treated as manufacturing because the seller’s contract price for that work equals at least 20 percent of the seller’s cost of goods sold or inventory amount for the property, the property has […]

R&D apportionment can have a real impact on the value of an IC-DISC structure, but it is often overlooked. When an IC-DISC commission is computed under the combined taxable income method, research and development costs may reduce the income base used to determine the commission. For exporters with meaningful product development activity, that can directly […]

An IC-DISC’s initial year often involves a straightforward organizational capitalization: shareholders contribute cash or other property to a newly formed corporation in exchange for stock, and the corporation files an IC-DISC election. A recurring compliance question is whether that startup transaction also triggers the information statement requirements under IRC § 351 and Treas. Reg. § […]

R&D apportionment can have a real impact on the value of an IC-DISC structure, but it is often overlooked.[cite:10] When an IC-DISC commission is computed under the combined taxable income method, research and experimental costs may reduce the income base used to determine the commission.[cite:10] For exporters with meaningful product development activity, that can directly […]

A high-yield export tax incentive is only as strong as your absolute adherence to strict IRS funding timelines. For U.S. exporters navigating the current fiscal landscape, tracking the exact IC-DISC Commission Payment Due Date (2026) and utilizing an optimized ic disc tax strategy provides a massive competitive advantage. By converting high-tax ordinary income into qualified […]

U.S. exporters face growing pressure from intense international competition, rising production costs, and narrowing margins. Yet many qualifying businesses overlook one of the most powerful, legally sanctioned federal incentives available to optimize their global trade operations: the IC-DISC.  Implementing an optimized ic disc tax strategy 2026 allows closely held manufacturers, distributors, and component suppliers to […]

A related supplier generally may not use the IC-DISC marginal costing method for sales of export property where the purchaser is related within IRC §954(d)(3) and the purchaser’s resale gives rise to foreign base company sales income under IRC §954(d). Treasury Regulation §1.994-2(a) states that the marginal costing rules do not apply in that circumstance, […]

For IC-DISC purposes, a sale through a distributor is not itself the legal test. The real question is whether the property qualifies as export property under IRC § 993(c)(1). That means the property must be manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted in the United States by a person other than the IC-DISC, held primarily for sale […]